moniquill:

whadyameanhesdead:

systlin:

glumshoe:

greatrazinsofthesunne:

glumshoe:

Wheat fields are more mystical than fields of other crops. You are 7,000 times more likely to meet an old god or see a portent of doom in a wheat field than in a field of like… soybeans.

For your consideration: cornfields

Cornfields are less mystical than wheat fields but more mystical than soybean fields. Two-bit monsters congregate in corn fields to eat people, but their power is nothing compared to the things that manifest in wheat fields. 

Have been in both wheat and cornfields; can confirm. Cornfields host monsters who eat people. Wheat fields attract old gods. 

I have a theory that this is because the notions most of us have of “old gods” are pretty intrinsically European, and wheat was (and is) the staple crop of European life. It is quite literally tied to the ancestral rituals and beliefs of most white people. Odin, the Morrigan, and even Zeus are actually linked to a set of peoples who cultivated wheat.

Meanwhile, corn (maize) is a crop native to the Americas. It features in the white cultural imagination in a very different way. Corn is a motif seen not in our ancestral myths, but in a much newer genre: the American Gothic. With its focus on the tensions between man and nature and—perhaps more importantly—the United States’s history of genocide against its indigenous population and trade in enslaved Africans, the American Gothic is VERY preoccupied with agriculture. Our monsters come out of corn fields because corn is a symbol for not only what we did to the Native Americans (who were the first to grow the crop), but of what we are doing to the very land itself. Corn is a monument to our cultural sins.

Meanwhile, I suspect that corn features very differently in the imaginations of people of color. If you asked a Native American person or a Latinx person what sort of mysticism they associate with corn fields, I imagine their answer would be very different than ours.

TLDR: White people associate wheat with our ancestors’ gods because our ancestors grew wheat. We associate corn with terrible monsters because it is a literal sign of our own monstrosity.

Native American here, can confirm that small plots of corn feel safe and homey; ideally they should be interplanted with other crops. You find turkeys and possums and raccoons in the corn. It might tell you important knowledge.

However.

Giant monocultures of corn, where the corn grows unbroken for miles and miles, not near human habitation, devoid of local wildlife, just corn on corn in the soft wind? Corn mega monocultures? Those sound like screaming.

I don’t think it’s anything to do with associations of mythology and everything to do with the fact that giant plots of corn are very easy to get lost in, and for things to hide in. It’s spooky. I doubt anyone looking at a corn field and being spooked by it is thinking about genocide and the destructive nature of monoculture. 

Wheat, meanwhile, is kind of… weird. It makes noises, but you can see that there’s nothing large hiding in there, because it’s not taller than you are. It feels more like a meadow, but meadows aren’t that flat and regular. 

milkycham:

problems with congratulating people on weight loss

• it might have been due to stress, depression or other non-celebratory factors
• it might have been due to an eating disorder. congratulating people with eating disorders on weight loss is like adding petrol to a fire and you can’t tell who’s got one by looking
• it might have been due to financial constraints
• it reiterates patriarchal standards of beauty, esp. when commenting on a girl’s body. it also suggests a certain amount of public ownership of one’s body
• not everyone considers weight loss an achievement or goal
• body comments can make the subject feel awkward regardless of positivity of comment
• weight loss is not inherently a good thing even if the person losing weight is ‘overweight’ or ‘obese’ (quotation marks are due to the total arbitrary nature of bmi calculations)

mad-hare:

If you can get close enough I would use a fishing net, otherwise food in a live trap might work.

Honestly, the old “stick on a string propping up a box with food underneath” thing that kids try sometimes would probably work.