If a guy falls off a cliff and dies, that’s an accident.

If a guy misidentifies poisonous berries, eats them, and dies, that’s an accident.

If a mosquito bites a guy and gives him a fatal disease, that’s natural causes.

if a tiger eats a guy, is that accidental death, or natural causes? 

Like, you can walk up to any animal you want and pet it with 0 negative consequences, it comes right up to you and makes happy whatever-animal noises. 

Me, I’d be tempted by any given big cat. I’d probably go with a pygmy marmoset and some grapes, though. Teeny-tiny monkey with teeny-tiny moustache and teeny-tiny hands. What’s not to love? 

I have a question, and explaining how I got to this question would be very long, but here it is. 

If women tend to like cute things more than men, and some aspect of that is due to instincts/hormones/etc, do trans women who are taking hormones start to like cute things more or have more interest in babies? 

Is there a relatively positive, gender-neutral term for “person who has a lot of sex and is not always the penetrative partner”? 

“Sl*t” feels like too strong a word and has a lot of negative connotations behind it, whereas “stud” generally refers to people with dicks and usually implies sexiness rather than actual amount of sex. 

“Hedonist” is a good word, but I feel like it implies more about someone’s lifestyle and morals than I necessarily want in this context. 

So, is there a word like that?