carry-on-my-wayward-butt:

habla-gated:

actualhumangirl:

anaisnein:

lokispriestess:

anaisnein:

mudwerks:

danipup:

wind-up-martyrbot:

literal-ghost:

potedo:

Whoever invented kangaroos is a fucking idiot

Kangaroos are animals that seem like they should be cryptids but it’s an entire species.

God: What if we just made a really horrible man? Give it. Give it lots of things. Tail leg. Belly sack. Talons. Abs. taste for flesh. Valid driver’s license. Fur.

the ability to beat the goddamn piss out of you.

and taunt you afterward

excuse me, this is an actual kangaroo? not a cunning-edit furry joke? you’re telling me this is what literal live kangaroos look like in real life?

yeah kangaroos are actually pretty mean looking. The cute ones are wallabies.

kangaroo^

wallaby^

kangaroo^

wallaby^

this is just so fucked up

As an Australian I can attest that our national symbol is indeed a jerk.

Kangaroos are fuckin terrifying

kangaroos look like they’d send me an out of focus dick pic at 4am with madoka magica scale figures on the shelf in the background that are badly hidden behind a tub of whey

shubbabang:

Patreon | Webtoon

Spiders balloon. Newly-hatched babies, or small ones that need to leave the area, climb up to a high place and release several long, thin strands of silk into the air, which allow them to float on the wind, attached to that silk. Sometimes they let go of it after they land, and that’s what you encounter. 
(or sometimes a spider is attached. yeah, spiders can glide. sorry.)

decepticonsensual:

naamahdarling:

the-purple-owl:

a-polite-melody:

fandomsandfeminism:

keyhollow:

fandomsandfeminism:

keyhollow:

fandomsandfeminism:

keyhollow:

fandomsandfeminism:

keyhollow:

fandomsandfeminism:

keyhollow:

fandomsandfeminism:

keyhollow:

friendly-neighborhood-patriarch:

keyhollow:

teakayblog:

fandomsandfeminism:

dietmountainmadewka:

fandomsandfeminism:

dietmountainmadewka:

this-is-cthulhu-privilege:

justmyantifeministtrash:

keyhollow:

fandomsandfeminism:

keyhollow:

xxleondraxx:

keyhollow:

hereinthemargins:

keyhollow:

But birth control is totally completely legal (in the US) and paid for by most insurance providers? And it’s like 9 dollars a month if the insurance falls through???

My birth control costs 100 DOLLARS for 4 weeks that’s almost an entire quarter of my income?? I’m completely dependent on that insurance it’s not that simple

You need better birth control babe, or give it up if your health isn’t dependent on it, like dayum.

My birth control is entierly free, even with my pretty not great insurence and I get 6 months at a time. With how many options there are just for birth control pills, I don’t see how a person could be stuck to $100 a month. Do some looking around. I garuntee there are less expensive options.

Like I’m on some that’s 9 dollars a month, and it is the most common pill in the US.

Stop gettin your birth control from drug dealers, hang up on the cartel, and get some cheap shit from a doctor

Unfortunately the most affordable generics simply don’t work for everyone. While they are fantastic for those who it does work for, some people CANT use those for a wide variety of medical reasons, and have to turn to more costly methods. 

$100 a month is absolutely awful, and hopefully there are better options around. But not everyone can get the most affordable generics no matter what. 

While true generics don’t always work if 100 is a quarter of your monthly you qualify for free insurance and ya ass has no excuse.

If you are somehow affording 100 a month, wait 6, try not to fuck, and get an IUD.

If it’s medical? I refer you to my first paragraph. Like I’m just sayin, there are ways

I mean I just googled it, and like with insurance the pill is like 15-60 a month, it’s really expensive if you don’t have insurance tho.

tbh Margaret Sanger was racist sociopath who makes modern neonazis on par with martin luther king Jr.

how about y’all just not fuck everyday like degenerates?

Do….do you think that you only take birth control pills…on the day you actually have sex?

do you think I’m not telling you to become celibate until you want to have children?

You think my husband and I need to be celibate until we are ready to be parents? Ahahahahahahahaha. That’s hilarious.

Birth control pills only work if you take it every day? It’s not the same as a plan b pill. Sex is a thing some people enjoy and they should be allowed to have it without fear of pregnancy. Birthing children is NOT the only purpose people with vaginas serve.

Sex without risk of pregnancy is a privilege not a right.

how do you mean?

I mean it’s a privilege, a luxury. Not a right, not a need.

The idea that only rich people should be able to have recreational sex is as baffling and silly as it is wholly useless.

I’m sorry who said anything about rich people? I said it was a luxury, not an expensive one.

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

Things can be extravagant and unnessisary without being expensive. A bubble bath with bath salts and sushi is extravagent. It isn’t expensive.

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

Again, this is subjective.

It is ectravagent to spend 20 dollars on a single bathbomb. Does that suddenly make it a huge sum of money and out of the realm of an average person purchasing it? No. But it is not needed for living and a lack of is not a human rights violation. Unless you side with the incels. In which case good fucking luck.

No one said it was a human rights violation? I said the idea that only rich people should have recreational sex is silly and USELESS. it doesnt actually present a workable, reasonable solution. Shouting “abstinence!” at grown ass adults because they dont want to be parents right now is ~not an effective solution ~

My husband and I are not going to be celibate because we dont want kids right this very instant, and its ridiculous to suggest that ANY couple should. It argues a puritan morality without regard to reasonable applicability.

You’re having a hard time here, so I’m going to spell this out very carefully. No one says you need to be rich to afford it. A luxury is an item you don’t need to survive. I’m also not shouting abstinence. If you can’t afford 6-15 dollars a month for birth control or 7 dollars for a pack of condoms, your ass doesn’t have time or money for sex.

Again, you’re going the all or nothing route. If you and your husband TOGETHER can’t afford 6-15 dollars a month for birth control/condoms, you need to worry more about your next meal than sex.

Last time I checked 6-15 dollars is not a “rich person” purchase you purposefully obtuse fuck.

Now excuse me while I bang my Boyfriend like a screen door in a hurricane while responsibly on birth control I paid for myself. It was 9 dollars. I’m a college student, poor as hell, what the fuck is your excuse?

Youve completely missed massive points.

  • People take birth control for reasons other than just sex.
  • Birth control should be available affordably through insurance (that you already pay for)
  • Not everyone can take the cheapest generics for medical reasons, and should still have birth control that works for them ne available affordably
  • Saying that people who cant get birth control, for whatever reason, just shouldnt have sex ever, is not a solution to the problem. Its a way to avoid actually thinking of a solution.
  • Holt shit, critical healthcare should not be treated as a luxury item. What in the god damn hell.

I know and I’ve mentioned it

It is

If you have unfortunate circumstances it’s just that, unfortunate, and unless you need it for medical purposes, it’s not a priority, and you need to dig deeper into your pocket. 20 bucks instead of ten. Oh no.

Condoms exist. Other sexual acts exist. But if you can’t afford to buy condoms, you can’t afford sex. Again a luxury, not a nesessity.

Birth control, unless for other medical purposes, isn’t critical. Getting your rocks off isn’t critical. Heat disease is critical, asthma is critical, severe allergies are critical, diabetes is critical, having sex is not.

These are not solutions to the problem. Its a way to avoid actually thinking of a solution. 

Like, maybe dictating what kind of sex married couples can have based on their income is a little invasive and creepy. But hey, reforming health care so that it covers basic preventative medicine that improves the quality of life for people would actually require some action. 

“If you have unfortunate circumstances it’s just that, unfortunate, and unless you need it for medical purposes, it’s not a priority, and you need to dig deeper into your pocket. 20 bucks instead of ten. Oh no.”

I’m a little confused by this.

When going to a pharmacy to actually get the prescribed birth control pill, and when the payment goes through insurance… how would they know whether or not it was needed for medical purposes?

Like, the birth control pill I’m on, before this year anyway (I live in Ontario and all prescriptions for people under 25 are now free of charge as long as you have a health card), would have cost me over $100 if not for insurance (I think it was $144 for three months). And I was put on that pill, after trying many others, for medical purposes and not for contraceptive purposes.

So, by what that says, if I were in the US, my insurance should cover most or all of the cost of this particular pill for me because I need to be on that one for medical purposes and can’t be on any of the others that were less expensive because they didn’t work for me. But other people on the same medication for only contraceptive purposes shouldn’t have the cost covered.

But… how would the insurance company know that? And where’s the cut off for who actually needs any medication, not just birth control. And would insurance companies be able to exploit that “well they don’t technically need this medication to survive to end up covering hardly any prescription medications? And even if a particular medication significantly improves someone’s quality of life… do they really need it if they’re still alive? In which case, even though my birth control is something I take for medical reasons, is it still a luxury because I wouldn’t die without it?

I don’t know. The US health care system is already really confusing to me. But this comment on how it’s proposed to work just confuses me even more.

how would the insurance company know that?

Literally the same way an insurance company knows the difference between an exploratory surgery used for testing purposes and an emergency one. The doctors tell them.

And where’s the cut off for who actually needs any medication, not just birth control

Same place it is now, up to the doctor’s assessment. When doctors send information to insurance companies to see if it will be covered, they give their assessment to whether they think it’s medically necessary or not. 

would insurance companies be able to exploit that “well they don’t technically need this medication to survive to end up covering hardly any prescription medications?

Insurance companies already do that for surgeries and other procedures. The way it works with medications is that certain medications are covered and some aren’t. This is usually based on things like price and their use and dosage and form. 

If you’re prescribed a drug that is not covered, then you appeal it on the grounds that it’s medically necessary for you. Then your doctor proves that you need it, and tada, it will be covered for you. 

And here’s the thing, for 99% of doctors “medically necessary” does not equal “you will die without it”. It’s usually some variation of “treats this condition and improves quality of life”. 

So the way it should work is that companies have the option of covering birth control right off the bat. And then if they don’t cover it, it’s not on the list of drugs they cover, then they make exceptions for patients for who their doctor’s say it’s medically necessary. 

First off, some birth control pills are fucking expensive. The kind I needed to stop unauthorized bleeding cost $150 without insurance!  With a 75% copay on meds over $50, it was still around $40.  That’s a big jump from $10, or $20, or $25.  If your drug is covered by your insurance at $10 a pop, that’s fantastic, but man, that does not generalize.

Here’s how the “medically necessary” bit goes for my insurance, which is shitty  about meds (state-funded Medicaid):

Doctor tells them it’s necessary.  Most doctors will go to bat for you on this.

They review it internally, the doctor’s note does NOT actually guarantee they will cover it!

If they decide it’s not necessary (this is decided by people who are often not even doctors and know nothing about your case or your situation), they reject it flat-out, again.  You CAN appeal.  It takes at least 60 days to go through.

If they decide it might be necessary, but there are other approved drugs that might treat the condition, they are allowed to insist that you:

1) Try 3 other drugs that are on their approved formulary for at least a month.

2) Provide documentation that those drugs do not work.

3) SUBMIT SIDE EFFECT REPORTS TO THE GODDAMN FDA AND CC THEM ON THE PAPERWORK!? I sincerely could not believe this one, it was absolutely wild.

So you do this, and you wait longer.

They will maybe cover it.  Or! They will “lose” parts of your records, forcing you to go through any of those steps again.  I am not exaggerating.

By then, it’s been around six months, assuming they don’t lose anything and you can get them to acknowledge faxes in a timely fashion. Paperwork often has to be submitted 2 or 3 times, sometimes more.  Each one of those, for each piece of paperwork, adds about 2-3 days assuming you call to confirm they got it (they recommend waiting 24-48 hours to make sure they got it) instead of waiting for the denial letters. Fuck you if you don’t have a phone, and fuck you if they don’t send the letter (about 1 in 4 did not arrive).

So that’s how it goes.

I fucking GAVE UP trying to get one of my psych meds approved.  The process gave me a goddamn mental breakdown and was more destructive to me than not having the meds was.  This is what they want, and it is built into the system not only passively through incompetence but *by design* in the way that they will second guess your doctor’s decision at every turn in an attempt to get you to do what they want, which is take either one of their approved drugs, or literally none at all.

On old insurance that I had, even with a doctor’s note saying it was necessary, they would NOT approve birth control.  Was this against the law?  Yeah, probably.  Could I do anything about it?  Hahahahaha!  Not without lawyers, which this bitch has literally never been able to afford!

These policies cause sickness and death, not just suffering and inconvenience.

This, despite how it gets framed about “wanting to fuck without consequences” is actually part of a larger picture, that of letting insurance companies choose not to cover incredibly common drugs. This is a form of institutional violence that penalizes sick people for being sick, and people with uteruses for being people with uteruses.  It penalizes people for trying to be responsible and manage their own reproductive health care.

The simplest and most human choice is to simply cover all forms of prescription/surgical birth control. This is actually very cost-effective, and it’s ethical.

But some of y’all’s “solution” to this problem that in the wider view (not just re: birth control) fucking kills people is to just “not fuck.”  Because a basic cornerstone of many human relationships, physical intimacy, is apparently like a widescreen TV, a luxury the poor should not be allowed to indulge in without censure.  “Live smaller, you worthless, shitpicking fucking plebes. Your performance of poverty is insufficiently humble. You want too much. Don’t become addicted to water.”

Ohhhhh, I fucking see.

Suck my ass.

“Don’t become addicted to water.”

THIS, holy shit.

That last post is perfect, but I just want to add that, FYI, the UN Office of the High Commissioner on Human Rights actually says there is a right to reproductive health care that’s not only legal, but affordable:

Women’s sexual and reproductive health is related to multiple human rights, including the right to life, the right to be free from torture, the right to health, the right to privacy, the right to education, and the prohibition of discrimination. The Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) have both clearly indicated that women’s right to health includes their sexual and reproductive health. This means that States have obligations to respect, protect and fulfill rights related to women’s sexual and reproductive health. The Special Rapporteur on the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health maintains that women are entitled to reproductive health care services, goods and facilities that are: (a) available in adequate numbers; (b) accessible physically and economically; © accessible without discrimination; and (d) of good quality. [source]

Funnily enough, the UN High Commissioner on Human Rights isn’t down with the idea that the solution to unaffordable birth control is “poor people shouldn’t fuck.”  Can’t imagine why. :/

Hi, I have endometriosis. 

During my period, small fragments of my endometrium, the inner lining of my uterus, escape into my abdominal cavity. No one knows exactly how this happens, but it does. Those fragments attach to my organs, including my intestines, the outside of my uterus, and my bladder. They can grow, and, during my period, they become inflamed as if trying to shed. That means inflamed sections of tissue are sticking my internal organs together. 

Guess what? It hurts. I spend two days in too much pain to get up, clutching a hot water bottle to my stomach, and three days in pain if I try to move. If I move too much and tear an adhesion, it feels like someone is ripping part of my guts out, because that’s flesh tearing away from organs. If I move just a bit and pull on the adhesions, it still hurts, and I have extremely strong cramps. 

If it’s allowed to continue unchecked, my pain will get worse, the adhesions will increase, and I’ll eventually need surgery to take the adhesions out. I also risk the adhesions tearing holes in my intestines.

If I take birth control, I don’t get my period. I don’t have to deal with almost a week of agony every month, I don’t have to worry about the adhesions growing, and the worst pain I get is an occasional twinge if I twist oddly and pull an adhesion. 

I need to take birth control. Other people have the same illness, or other illnesses, that require them to take birth control for their health and comfort. Some people might just want to take birth control so they don’t have to deal with monthly periods- which, yes, is safe. You can stop your periods with certain medications with no ill effects, assuming you don’t have side effects. 

And, you know what? Sex is healthy. It has mental and physical health benefits, and it’s a part of a certain type of close relationship for a lot of people. And that includes marriage. 

Sometimes married people might not want to have a baby. Maybe they aren’t ready. Maybe one partner can’t safely get pregnant. 

People should be able to have sex without worrying about pregnancy. This is not a radical statement. 

caitallolovesyou:

uppityfemale:

The President charges his own Secret Service to use his golf carts.

The Secret Service also had to move out of their floors in Trump Tower because they couldn’t afford the lease.

THE PRESIDENT IS MAKING MONEY OFF OF HIS PRESIDENTIAL SECURITY DETAIL.

THEY ARE REQUIRED BY LAW TO PROTECT HIM AND HE’S CHARGING THEM AT HIS PRIVATE BUSINESSES TO DO SO.

The Secret Service is almost out of money. Trump spent in one year on travel what Obama spent in eight (not to mention profited off of it). They can’t afford to pay people their people to cover Trump’s huge family as they travel for work and go on vacation every week.

This is corruption.
This is unethical.
This is something we should all be mad as Hell about.

This was actually so insane to me that I figured I HAD to make sure it was real before reblogging it with no sources. It seems to be totally real.

sources: 
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/trumps-clubs-charge-60k-to-rent-carts-to-secret-service-as-agency-runs-out-of-money-2017-08-21
http://www.businessinsider.com/secret-service-trump-tower-rent-command-post-2017-8
(and there are many more if you googlefu, but most of them weren’t sources I particularly like or trust so I’m not linking them here.)

Anyway yes, this is like textbook corruption. This is our tax dollars at work, people!